Skip to main content

Which medium-sized sports agencies come recommended by UK clients?

With the 2022 World Cup under way, we take a look at which Recommended agencies offer specialist sports marketing services. Which medium-sized sports agencies come recommended by clients? / Unsplash The Drum Recommends is a free service designed by The Drum to help marketers find relevant, trusted agencies. Recommendations are based on reviews by the people best placed to judge their expertise – their clients. Every year, The Drum Recommends receives thousands of ratings from advertisers. Marketers complete a survey that scores their agency’s performance and the quality and range of their services, as well as price. In order to become recommended for a service, agencies must receive a minimum of three client ratings. Since the 2022 World Cup kicked off this week in Qatar, it’s a good moment to take a look at the Recommended agencies that have expertise in sports marketing. Below you’ll find each agency, plus its staff headcount and office locations. Would you recomme...
Post a Comment

The risk of website redesign (and a better approach)

Websites can sometimes suffer from style over functionality. Jonny Longden of Journey Further encourages those thinking about a full redesign to carefully reconsider.

Many years ago, I worked for an agency that worked on the full redesign of a high-profile retailer’s website. It cost them around £1m in total to design, build and deploy the new website. There was very little research done and the project was driven by user experience (UX) ‘expert’ opinion.

Within three weeks of launching the new site, the business had lost nearly £1m in revenue due to a huge drop in conversion rate, and they were forced to revert to the previous version of the site. It ditched the vast majority of the work and simply updated the visual look and feel of the new site. A lot of money was wasted.

Anyone who has worked in digital marketing for any length of time can share similar stories. But what is far more common – which you won’t hear about – is big redesign projects where there is very little impact on performance. Many businesses consider this to be a success, but what was the point of doing it? Why spend £1m on something that doesn’t improve performance?

Why are you redesigning your website anyway?

On average, only around one in 10 experiments can prove an uplift on whatever they are measuring. This means that 90% of ideas are a waste of time, or worse. When you redesign your website, you are essentially applying opinion and guesswork to everything, and it risks a lot of investment; there is genuinely very little reason or logic for anyone to redesign a website. Let’s look at some of the most common reasons that people give.

‘The style and brand are outdated and need refreshing’: OK, so just reskin the website then. You can update the visual look and feel (styling, fonts, images) without remotely touching the UX or functionality. So why redesign the way it works as well?

‘We need to re-platform’: Re-platforming a website is inevitable sometimes; however, the point of doing this is to make the process of managing the back end and content more efficient or effective. This has absolutely nothing to do with the front-end experience for the user, so why are you redesigning it?

‘It doesn’t work very well’: Really? Says who? This is mostly just another way of saying, ‘I don’t like it.’ Well, what about your entire customer base? Even if there are fundamental issues with the site, then just resolve those specific things. Why redesign the entire site?

Evolution, not revolution

Amazon, in its entire history, has never completely redesigned its website. There have been times when a significant difference was made, but primarily to its look and feel. Otherwise, it’s a very gradual process of evolution and iterative development.

Instead of a full redesign, you need to evolve your website through careful iterative experimentation and learning. If you think there are things wrong with your website, break them down into separate things and test them. You will be wrong nine out of 10 times, but when you are right, you can then develop and build on those ideas.

Proper experimentation takes far more skill than most people realize, but given the alternative massive spend associated with large redesigns, investing in these skills will be a fraction of that cost.

But if you absolutely must

OK, so sometimes – for whatever reason – you are going to redesign the website. And if you have to do this, then this is the best way to go about it:

  1. Break down all the things you think are wrong with the existing site and all the things you want to see in the new site (list them separately)

  1. Find a way to test these things on your existing site. You can’t always test things in full, but you can always find a way to test something smaller in order to validate whether your reasoning seems correct

  1. Learn, learn, learn. Very few people understand the real point of experimentation, which is learning. What do the results of your tests tell you about your theories and how people behave?

  1. Consolidate all this learning into a design brief

  1. Continue to test on your existing site throughout the redesign. Anything new the designer wants to include, test it on the existing site

  1. Build and deploy

  1. Once live, continue to test. You should have a really good idea at this point about the different hypotheses and theories that have gone into the redesign, so keep testing

  1. Never stop testing



The risk of website redesign (and a better approach)
Entertainment Flash Report
Labels:

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Hide The Pain Harold realizes cause of strained face in antacid ad

Hide the Pain Harold (aka András Arató) is using his famous face to front a new ad for Brazilian antacid brand Eno. In ‘Cara de Azia’ (‘Heartburn Face’), viewers see Arató emphasize that he always thought he had a normal face, but when it became a famous meme he desperately tried to change it to no avail. One day, on the set of a modeling shoot as his alias ‘Harold,’ Arató notices one of the technicians is making a face similar to his own due to heartburn. In a lightbulb moment, he realizes that perhaps acid reflux has been the source of his strained face all these years. The campaign was created by Publicis Leon. Creative directors Laura Azevedo and Ricardo Schreier said: “To have one of the biggest memes in the world in our campaign combines work and fun. The ’Cara de Azia’ campaign is not only a relief for Harold, but also for consumers. Talking about heartburn doesn’t have to be boring.” It’s not the first time Hide The Pain Harold has popped up in an ad. Last month, The Drum...
Post a Comment
Read more

Women’s Aid subverts England’s ‘It’s Coming Home’ with domestic violence message

Ad by House 337 marks International Day for the Elimination of Violence Against Women​. Women’s Aid and House 337 have subverted England’s ’It’s Coming Home’ call to highlight increased cases of domestic violence around the World Cup. The chilling minute-long film is a single shot panning across an ordinary English street as people enjoying the game, but it then hits one home with a flag reading ‘He’s coming home.’ Advertisement Women’s Aid developed the campaign in response to the stat that domestic violence cases increase by 38% during the winter months and the fact more men are staying home to watch the games. Christopher Ringsell, who is creative director at House 337, said: “During this time, as the nation comes together, we want to subvert the usual football tropes and shine a light on the chilling fact that for many women it’s a time of fear, not celebration. They need your support too. The visual spectacle of the flag retains its power, but with a new, chilling twist.“...
Post a Comment
Read more

The Balenciaga blame game: why the buck stops with the brand after controversial campaign

Luxury fashion house has faced severe criticism after its Christmas campaign was found to include several references to child abuse. Can it really deny any blame? Balenciaga came under fire for two, now deleted, photoshoots that appear to have sinister undertones. The first was its Christmas campaign, shot by Gabriele Galimberti, which depicted young children holding the brand’s ‘plush bear bags’ that appear to be wearing S&M-style harnesses. This came alongside its Spring 23 ad, which Newsweek attributes to photographer Chris Maggio , in which a Supreme Court document on child pornography cases can be seen on a table. The backlash has resulted in a social media blame game, with brand and creatives each pointing the finger at each other. Advertisement A Balenciaga statement on Instagram said: “We take this matter very seriously and are taking legal action against the parties responsible for creating the set and including unapproved items for our spring 23 campaign photoshoo...
Post a Comment
Read more